FUMO CALLS FOR RESTORATION OF MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE FUNDING
HARRISBURG, January 30, 2002 – Because
of difficult economic times and the recent rise in unemployment in
Pennsylvania, the state should restore funding to a program that helps people
pay their mortgage when they lose their jobs, state Senator Vincent J. Fumo
(D-Philadelphia) said today.
Fumo, the Democratic
chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, promised to make the
Homeowners Emergency Mortgage Assistance Program (HEMAP) a top priority in the
upcoming budget cycle.
The fund provides
temporary assistance in the form of a loan for working people who lose their
jobs. When the workers find new jobs, they repay the loans. Since changes were
made to the program and the General Fund appropriation was eliminated in 1998,
participation has fallen significantly, despite the fact that applications
have risen during the past two years because of the slowing economy.
"The need for
this program has been increasing lately. Although I realize that it will be a
tight budget year because of the weak economy, that’s exactly when this type
of aid is in greatest demand," Fumo said.
Prior to 1996, the
state budget contained a line item appropriation of $18.5
million
for HEMAP. That year, however, then-Gov. Tom Ridge proposed eliminating the
annual appropriation. The General Assembly approved line-item funding at
reduced levels for two more years, but the 1998 budget finally ended the
appropriation. HEMAP has since survived only on the money from repaid loans,
with tightened loan eligibility requirements.
Fumo and other
Democrats opposed the elimination of the appropriation.
Lately, however, Ridge
and Gov. Mark Schweiker have demonstrated keen awareness of the important role
that the state should play in making sure that a change in employment
situation does not disrupt a family’s home life. Although Ridge left state
service to take a position as head of national homeland security, he has
accepted a state offer of rent-free living in the governor’s mansion for
nearly four months.
"Obviously, the
leaders of the administration now recognize that when the primary breadwinner
experiences a dramatic or sudden change in his job situation, the government
can help prevent the family from winding up out on the street," Fumo
said.
"If we can
provide a grant to Tom Ridge just because he changed jobs, surely we can
provide a loan to working-class men and women who lose their jobs," he
added.
Although requests for
help from HEMAP have increased each year since 1997 and hit a record level in
2001 as state unemployment rose, both the number of loans approved and the
dollar amounts of those loans have declined over the past five years.
In 1997, HEMAP
received 5,928 applications for help. It approved 2,093 loans and disbursed
$18 million. By 2001, despite receiving an all-time high of 8,381 requests,
HEMAP shrank to 1,710 loan approvals and disbursed only $11.5 million.
"Clearly this
program is headed in the wrong direction," said Fumo. "At a time
when more people are finding themselves out of work, the state should be
helping more
people save their
homes. It is time we add more money to the HEMAP fund, so that fewer
unemployed families – some of whom are probably economic victims of the
Sept. 11 terrorist attacks – are kicked out of their homes."
HEMAP’s fund
balance, which stood at $5.6 million as of July 2001, is projected to fall
below $3.2 million by the end of this fiscal year. If demand for loans
continues to grow, it could run out of money by 2003.
Fumo said he will
propose restoring the line item to at least a $10 million annual
appropriation. In addition, he will seek legislative changes that will reverse
the more stringent eligibility requirements enacted several years ago.
In particular, Fumo
said he will advocate a return to giving borrowers 36 months of assistance
instead of 24, at a cost of $5 million annually. Another $5 million would go
toward ensuring the program’s solvency through 2004.
Nearly 80 percent of
applications for HEMAP assistance were rejected last year. Although some were
legitimate denials, Fumo hopes the additional funding would encourage more
compassionate lending decisions that would result in another 350 families per
year being served.
HEMAP BACKGROUND
HEMAP was established
in 1983 to provide mortgage assistance to homeowners attempting to avoid
losing their homes through foreclosure. Eligibility limits restrict aid to
those facing foreclosure due to the loss of employment or other circumstances
beyond their direct control.
Since its inception,
HEMAP has received $177 million in state General Fund support, but none since
the 1997-98 fiscal year. HEMAP has enabled more than 28,000
families
to save their homes.
The second Ridge
budget, introduced in February of 1996, proposed elimination of any future
General Fund support for HEMAP, which had received $18.5 million the previous
year. The General Assembly eventually approved a $3 million appropriation that
kept the program operating at reduced levels.
The Pennsylvania
Housing Finance Agency (PHFA,) which administers the program, prepared to shut
down HEMAP because of lack of funds, but the General Assembly approved a $10
million appropriation in 1997-98.
Act 160 of 1998 made
substantial changes to the program to reduce the amount and time period of
financial assistance, and to further restrict eligibility. The curtailed
program then became self supporting through loan repayments, and General Fund
support ceased.
The Act 160 changes
restricted eligibility to loans that were delinquent 24 months or less. The
previous limit was 36 months. Assistance could continue for 24 months, reduced
from 36 months. Also, payback provisions were amended to require loan
recipients to begin repayment as soon as their housing payments did not exceed
40 percent of their net income. The previous ceiling was 35 percent.
In 1996 when Ridge
first called for the elimination of the HEMAP appropriation, he made other
major budget cuts, including a dramatic reduction in health care coverage. He
took Medical Assistance away from several hundred thousand poor
Pennsylvanians, claiming his budget would have a $250 million deficit if those
cuts were not made. The state actually ended that fiscal year with a $576
million revenue surplus.
#